Where he blogs about his eclipse musings
Uncategorized
Tell, Don’t Ask – Part 2
Sep 4th
Objects exposing behavior, not state
Controlling complexity of your codebase by limiting what state your objects expose
The more objects that can see and change states on other objects, the more complex your system. Objects returning a boolean mean that someone calling that method will use an if branch, returning an integer would mean someone using if/else or switch/case. Returning objects would mean introspeting that returned object to invoke something else on it. This increases coupling between classes, makes code hard to read and test.
My class has 3 friends, I talk to my friends’ friends. My friends are difficult to mock, therefore mocking sucks…
… well, yeah!
Testing procedural code is hard. Testing such code generally involves setting up “data” and asserting on state of objects. Tell Don’t Ask code on the other hand is easier to test since you’re not testing state. Also notice how DI makes things simpler to test.
void testOwnerCanFeedDog(){
Dog dog = new Dog();
// have to create a mouth since owner calls dog.getMouth() to feed it
Mouth mouth = new Mouth();
dog.setMouth(mouth);
PetOwner owner = new PetOwner();
owner.setDog(dog);
owner.feedDog(food);
// verify that the dog gets the food (well the mouth, actually)
assertEquals(food, mouth.getFood());
}
void testOwnerCanFeedDog(){
Dog dog = mock(Dog.class);
PetOwner owner = new PetOwner(dog);
owner.feed(food);
// verify that the dog gets the food
verify(dog).feed(food);
}
Without Dependency Injection, testing is quite difficult; without Tell Don’t Ask, testing is almost always impossible. Put together, things are separated, testing is simplified.
Tell, Don’t Ask – Part 1
Sep 4th
I spend more time reading code than writing it. I therefore like code that is readable. Rarely do I like to read code that is verbose and does too much orchestration in order to do something that is orthognal to what I’m looking for.
Code is easier to read and maintain when objects are written in a Tell Don’t Ask.
“Tell, Don’t Ask” is a style of programming where anObject tells anotherObject to doSomething(), rather than asking anotherObject to getSomeValue() and then makeADecision().
Code that does violates this this is more procedural than it is object oriented. In the procedural world code is written to fetch some data (or state) and then make a decision or perform some action. Procedural programming “pulls data” into the logic to get things done.
In object oriented programming, we do the opposite — have objects do something for you instead of you doing it yourself. Don’t overdo this too much, someone still has to do the real work though
Identifying places where you may tell instead of ask:
class PetOwner{
void feedDog(Food food){
if(getDog().isHungry()){
dog.getMouth().putFood(food);
}
}
}
This can instead be written as:
class PetOwner{
void feedDog(Food food){
dog.feed(food);
}
}
class Dog{
void feed(Food food){
if (iAmHungry()){
// consume food
}
}
}
Notice how the PetOwner does not know (or care to know) about the fact that the dog has a mouth.
Code Coverage And Functional Tests
Aug 26th
I am often asked this rather perilous question:
How do I view code coverage for my functional tests?
Short answer:
Here’s how…. However, use it only for figuring out what functionality is not covered, not as a workaround for not having enough unit and integrations.
Having to use functional tests to determine percentage of code coverage is IMO a bad smell, avoid as much as possible.
GEF Support for SWTBot
Aug 4th
A long pending request from swtbot users has been support for GEF. The SWTBot4GEF project was created as a sandbox to see how feasible things were in the GEF world.
Mariot Chauvin recently polished the initial contribution from David Green and released a version 0.1 of the gef support. We’re working towards integrating this as part of swtbot and you should hear more about it once the IP process is done
SWTBot Getting Started Video Tutorials
Jul 15th
Getting started with SWTBot is a unique experience for a lot of users, and myself. Unlike most other projects hosted at eclipse.org, it’s a UI testing tool written for primarily for testers to be able to write automated tests.
In this regard the users of swtbot are a bit special. Most of them understand testing and the principles associated with testing but do not necessarily understand swt, threading models and the workbench and platform internals. Getting such users to use eclipse, create test plugins and write tests in java involves more than just documentation and screenshots.
Mohammed recently posted two such 5 minute videos. Getting started with swtbot in under 5 minutes, and run your UI tests in a headless build from within ant.
A video is worth a thousand images
Just upgraded my blog to a newer wordpress…
Jul 15th
… and just wanted to see all the parts are still moving.
Sriram at JavaOne
May 2nd
It’s official now. Sriram a colleague at ThoughtWorks has finally got a US Visa to speak at JavaOne in San Fransisco. He’ll be speaking on OpenGrok, “a fast and usable source code search and cross reference engine.”
He compiles Mozilla on Opensolaris during nights, and has recently been working on getting SWT/Mozilla to work on OpenSolaris-gtk. He aims to eventually contribute eclipse builds for opensolaris. This would also get a lot og SWT based apps like the Google Web Toolkit(GWT) to work on OpenSolaris
You can catch up with him at JavaOne and the Eclipse Party at JavaOne.
Sriram lives here.